Lorikeet

vs

Lorikeet vs Fin

Lorikeet vs Decagon

Lorikeet vs Decagon

vs

Decagon

AI concierge that takes action

AI concierge that takes action

AI concierge that takes action

Why teams switch from Decagon to Lorikeet: Teams choose Lorikeet when they want an agent that can take real actions across systems, including multi-agent architecture that can coordinate with third parties. Lorikeet deploys agent Product Managers and engineering support to help you ramp fast and specializes in complex and compliant industries - fintech, healthtech and more.

The Lorikeet difference:

→ Action-taking, not just FAQ - including agentic coordination between third parties
→ Agent Concierge and customer memory across all channels (voice, SMS, chat, email)
→ Ops-friendly configurability - more knobs and dials available out of the box
→ Pay only per successful resolution - not per interaction

See it in action.
See it in action.
See it in action.
Trusted by CX leaders in fintech, health tech and complex industries

Customers love us

Lorikeet is preferred over Decagon for performance, configurability and compliance

Customers love us

Lorikeet is preferred over Decagon for performance, configurability and compliance

Customers love us

Lorikeet is preferred over Decagon for performance, configurability and compliance

Lorikeet

vs

Decagon

See how Lorikeet stacks up

LorikeetDecagon
Agentic workflows
Yes, Orchestrated resolution + complex actions
Yes - RAG, natural language workflows
Integration with Intercom
Low latency voice AI
Agentic workflows, not just FAQ
Configurable for complex, regulated use cases
Price by resolution
Yes - <0.80
Yes - 0.99
You define satisfactory 'resolution'
No, Fin's definition of resolution
PM and Engineering support
Customer memory after interruption
Proactive Coach to improve quality
A/B testing and QA features

Built for complexity and compliance

Unlike Decagon, you can use Lorikeet for the most complex, regulated use cases where customers need action taking

Built for complexity and compliance

Unlike Decagon, you can use Lorikeet for the most complex, regulated use cases where customers need action taking

Built for complexity and compliance

Unlike Decagon, you can use Lorikeet for the most complex, regulated use cases where customers need action taking

Built for complexity and compliance

Unlike Decagon, you can use Lorikeet for the most complex, regulated use cases where customers need action taking

Plugs easily into any ticketing system

Instant integration with Intercom, Zendesk, Front, Hubspot, and any other ticketing system available

Plugs easily into any ticketing system

Instant integration with Intercom, Zendesk, Front, Hubspot, and any other ticketing system available

Plugs easily into any ticketing system

Instant integration with Intercom, Zendesk, Front, Hubspot, and any other ticketing system available

Endlessly configurable agents

Unlike Decagon, we deploy AI PMs and engineering teams to enable agentic-action taking across multiple agents

Endlessly configurable agents

Unlike Decagon, we deploy AI PMs and engineering teams to enable agentic-action taking across multiple agents

Endlessly configurable agents

Unlike Decagon, we deploy AI PMs and engineering teams to enable agentic-action taking across multiple agents

Endlessly configurable agents

Unlike Decagon, we deploy AI PMs and engineering teams to enable agentic-action taking across multiple agents

Agentic workflows

Lorikeet

Yes, Orchestrated resolution + complex actions

Decagon

Yes - RAG, natural language workflows

QA, analytics and agent coaching

Lorikeet

Yes - Lorikeet Coach

Decagon

Limited - Watchtower
(not conversational AI)

Multi-agent action-taking

Lorikeet

Yes - team of agents

Decagon

Limited - single agent actions

Deploy in days

Lorikeet

Yes

Decagon

No - longer rollout

Priced based on successful resolution

Lorikeet

Yes - <$0.80/resolution

Decagon

No - priced per interaction

Configurability w/ PM and Eng team included

Lorikeet

Yes

Decagon

Limited customisation

Best fit

Lorikeet

Fast time-to-value + repeatable scaling

Decagon

Enterprises investing in longer build cycles

10 questions to evaluate an agentic AI platform for CX

1. Can it execute multi-step workflows, not just answer questions?
1. Can it execute multi-step workflows, not just answer questions?
1. Can it execute multi-step workflows, not just answer questions?
2. Can it take real actions in systems of record?
2. Can it take real actions in systems of record?
2. Can it take real actions in systems of record?
3. Does it preserve context across channels?
3. Does it preserve context across channels?
3. Does it preserve context across channels?
4. How does it handle escalation and human handoff?
4. How does it handle escalation and human handoff?
4. How does it handle escalation and human handoff?
5. What are the guardrails for policy and compliance?
5. What are the guardrails for policy and compliance?
5. What are the guardrails for policy and compliance?
6. What's the true measure of resolution quality?
6. What's the true measure of resolution quality?
6. What's the true measure of resolution quality?
7. What does post-deployment iteration look like?
7. What does post-deployment iteration look like?
7. What does post-deployment iteration look like?
8. Can it maintain audit trails and explain reasoning?
8. Can it maintain audit trails and explain reasoning?
8. Can it maintain audit trails and explain reasoning?
9. Have you tested with difficult real-world cases?
9. Have you tested with difficult real-world cases?
9. Have you tested with difficult real-world cases?
10. Can it meet your security and data requirements?
10. Can it meet your security and data requirements?
10. Can it meet your security and data requirements?

See your workflows resolved live

See your workflows resolved live

See your workflows resolved live